github.com/abiosoft/colima
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
CLI tool masquerading as a Go library - minimal programmatic API
The actual developer experience is centered around the CLI, which has decent subcommand organization (start, stop, status, etc.) and YAML-based configuration. Documentation focuses on installation and CLI usage rather than Go API integration. Error messages from the CLI are generally clear when VM operations fail, but there's no exported API documentation or examples for programmatic usage.
For teams needing Docker Desktop alternatives on macOS, Colima works well as an end-user tool that developers interact with via shell commands or Makefiles. However, expecting rich Go library features, type definitions for IDE support, or programmatic integration patterns will lead to disappointment.
Best for: Teams needing a Docker Desktop alternative controlled via CLI tools, scripts, or Makefiles rather than programmatic Go integration.
Avoid if: You need a Go library with exported APIs to programmatically manage containers or VMs from your application code.
Container runtime with limited operational controls and observability
Resource management is straightforward through CLI flags (CPU, memory, disk), but runtime observability is limited. There's no structured logging API to hook into, no metrics endpoints, and debugging issues under load requires ssh-ing into the VM and manual inspection. Configuration changes often require full VM restarts, which isn't ideal for production-adjacent workflows. Timeout behavior is mostly implicit, and there's no built-in retry logic - you're responsible for wrapping calls in your own error handling.
The breaking changes between minor versions (especially around mount handling and network configuration) have caused unexpected issues in CI/CD pipelines. For local development it's adequate, but if you need programmatic control or deep observability for automated workflows, you'll find yourself writing significant wrapper code.
Best for: Local development environments where you need a lightweight Docker Desktop replacement and primarily interact via CLI.
Avoid if: You need programmatic control, structured logging/metrics, or zero-downtime configuration updates for CI/CD automation.
Container runtime manager with limited security transparency
The dependency chain is concerning - you're trusting Colima's update cadence for underlying Lima, QEMU, and container runtime patches. When CVEs hit containerd or Docker, you're dependent on Colima maintainers to update references and test compatibility. There's no explicit security advisory process or CVE tracking visible in the project.
Authentication between host and VM relies on SSH key generation during initial setup, which is reasonable, but error messages sometimes expose file paths and system details that could aid reconnaissance. The configuration file format allows arbitrary VM settings without input validation warnings for dangerous combinations. For development environments this is acceptable, but using it for anything security-sensitive requires careful auditing of the generated VM configuration and network topology.
Best for: Local development environments where container runtime abstraction is more important than fine-grained security control.
Avoid if: You need auditable security controls, rapid CVE response, or are running anything beyond local development workloads.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In