github.com/asdf-vm/asdf
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Not a Go package - asdf-vm is a shell-based version manager CLI tool
The 'github.com/asdf-vm/asdf' identifier in a Go registry context appears to be a mistake or misconfiguration. You cannot 'go get' this and use it as a dependency. If you're looking for version management in Go applications, you'd want actual Go libraries. If you need runtime version management for development environments, you'd install asdf-vm directly via their shell installation process, not through Go modules.
From a production/operations perspective, this has zero applicability as a Go package because it simply isn't one. Any attempt to import or use it in Go code would fail immediately.
Best for: This is not suitable for use as a Go package under any circumstances.
Avoid if: You are looking for any kind of Go library functionality; use asdf-vm directly as a CLI tool instead.
Shell-based version manager with significant security and reliability concerns
The error handling is particularly problematic from a security perspective. Failed plugin installations often leave partial state without clear rollback, and error messages can expose system paths and environment details. The plugin ecosystem lacks consistent input validation—many plugins don't properly sanitize version strings or download URLs, making them vulnerable to command injection if you're programmatically managing versions.
Authentication for plugin sources is essentially non-existent. There's no signing mechanism for plugins, no integrity verification beyond basic git operations, and the trust model assumes all plugin maintainers are benign. TLS is handled by underlying curl/wget calls in plugins, but there's no enforcement of modern crypto standards at the asdf layer.
Best for: Local development environments where you accept the security tradeoffs of shell-based plugin execution.
Avoid if: You're building production systems, CI/CD pipelines with elevated privileges, or environments requiring supply chain security guarantees.
Version manager with significant security and trust model concerns
From a security perspective, asdf's design raises serious concerns. Plugins execute arbitrary shell scripts from third-party repositories with minimal vetting. The plugin system downloads and runs code that modifies PATH and executes installation scripts, creating a broad attack surface. There's no built-in signature verification for plugins or downloaded binaries, relying entirely on HTTPS and trust in plugin maintainers. The .tool-versions file auto-execution can lead to unexpected code execution when entering directories.
The shell-based architecture makes it difficult to audit what's actually happening during installations. Error messages often expose full system paths and environment details. For production environments or security-conscious teams, the implicit trust model and lack of supply chain verification mechanisms make this a risky dependency management choice.
Best for: Local development environments where convenience outweighs security concerns and plugin sources are individually vetted.
Avoid if: You need cryptographically verified dependencies, operate in regulated environments, or require auditable supply chain security for production tooling.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In