github.com/danielmiessler/Fabric
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
CLI-first tool wrapped as a library - integration concerns and stability issues
Resource management is a concern - there's no built-in connection pooling for API calls, and timeout configurations are scattered across different command implementations rather than centralized. Error handling tends toward log-and-exit patterns appropriate for CLI but problematic for long-running services. Observability is minimal - you get stdout/stderr logging but no structured logging hooks or metrics integration points.
The actual pattern API is interesting for batch text processing jobs, but wrapping it in proper retry logic, circuit breakers, and monitoring requires significant work. If you need the specific AI patterns Fabric provides, budget time for building a robust integration layer around it.
Best for: Batch processing scripts and CLI tooling where you control the execution environment and can pin versions aggressively.
Avoid if: You need a stable library dependency for long-running services or require proper resource management and observability integration.
AI prompting tool masquerading as a Go library - confusing developer experience
The package structure exposes internal implementation details without clear boundaries between public and private APIs. Error messages often reference CLI flags and file paths rather than providing context useful for programmatic usage. Common tasks like setting up a pattern executor or managing AI providers require diving into the CLI source code to understand the intended flow.
Debugging is frustrating because the codebase assumes CLI context. Stack Overflow has minimal coverage, and GitHub issues primarily address CLI features rather than library integration. If you need AI prompt management in Go, you'll spend more time reverse-engineering this tool than building your feature.
Best for: Using the pre-built CLI tool for AI workflows, not integrating into Go applications.
Avoid if: You need a Go library with clear APIs for AI prompt management in your application.
AI prompt framework with significant security and design concerns
The error handling is particularly concerning - API responses and failures often expose full request/response bodies in logs, potentially leaking sensitive data or prompt injection attempts. Input validation is minimal; user-supplied prompts and patterns are passed nearly verbatim to LLM APIs without sanitization or length limits. There's no built-in rate limiting, retry backoff logic, or circuit breaker patterns despite making external API calls.
The authentication model is simplistic (just API key passthrough), and there's no guidance on implementing proper authorization when wrapping this in a service. TLS configuration relies entirely on Go's defaults with no customization options. The project moves fast with frequent releases, but dependency management feels loose with several transitive dependencies that aren't actively audited for CVEs.
Best for: Quick prototyping and personal automation scripts where security boundaries are already established externally.
Avoid if: You need production-grade security controls, handle user-generated content, or require compliance with data protection regulations.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In