github.com/dgraph-io/dgraph
Community Reviews
Powerful graph database but operationally challenging with stale Go client
Connection pooling with dgo clients requires manual management through gRPC connection pools. There's no automatic retry logic, so you'll implement your own backoff strategies. The observability story is mixed - logs are verbose but structured logging isn't consistent across versions. Timeout configuration exists but defaults are surprisingly aggressive for distributed queries.
The biggest operational pain point is version compatibility. Schema migrations between versions can be breaking, and the 1.2.8 release from 2020 is ancient by Go standards. Backup/restore operations block other operations, and graceful shutdowns under load require careful orchestration. The alpha/raft protocol adds complexity when debugging connection issues in clustered deployments.
Best for: Teams with dedicated database operations expertise needing a self-hosted graph database with strong consistency.
Avoid if: You need a lightweight client library, lack ops resources for database tuning, or require active maintenance and security updates.
Powerful graph database with significant operational overhead and stability concerns
Memory usage can spike unpredictably during large queries or bulk mutations, making capacity planning challenging. The timeout configuration exists but default values are often too generous for production workloads. Observability is limited - you'll need to instrument heavily around the client calls since the library provides minimal structured logging hooks. Breaking changes between minor versions have been problematic, particularly around schema migration paths.
The version referenced (1.2.8 from 2020) is significantly outdated and shouldn't be used for new projects. Current maintained versions have improved some issues but the fundamental operational complexity remains. The performance can be excellent for graph traversals when properly tuned, but getting there requires deep expertise.
Best for: Teams with strong database operations expertise needing graph traversal performance at scale and willing to invest in operational tooling.
Avoid if: You need predictable resource usage, simple operations, or lack dedicated database reliability engineering resources.
Powerful graph database but client library shows its age and complexity
Documentation exists but assumes familiarity with graph concepts and Dgraph's specific semantics. Error messages often reference internal implementation details rather than user-facing problems. The transaction API works but lacks the ergonomics of modern ORMs - you manually manage commits, rollbacks, and retries. IDE autocompletion helps little since most interactions are string-based queries.
The package hasn't been updated since 2020, which shows in its pre-generics design and lack of modern Go patterns. Migration between Dgraph versions can be painful as schema changes require careful coordination. For simple use cases, you'll write more boilerplate than expected; for complex graph queries, the power is there but buried under API friction.
Best for: Teams already committed to Dgraph infrastructure who need direct database access and can invest time learning its specific patterns.
Avoid if: You need rapid development with strong type safety, or want a modern Go library with active maintenance and comprehensive examples.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In