github.com/docker/compose
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Outdated internal library - use docker/docker or CLI instead
The error messages are often cryptic because they're designed for CLI output rather than programmatic handling. When things go wrong, you're debugging internal compose logic rather than clear API boundaries. Documentation is virtually non-existent for library usage - what exists assumes you understand Docker Compose internals. Stack Overflow has almost no coverage of this package as a library, and GitHub issues are focused on the CLI tool, not programmatic usage.
If you need to work with Docker programmatically, use github.com/docker/docker (the Docker Engine API client) or shell out to the docker-compose CLI. This package will leave you fighting against its design rather than building with it.
Best for: Forking or studying Docker Compose internals, not building production applications.
Avoid if: You need a maintained, documented library for Docker orchestration - use docker/docker engine API instead.
Outdated library with security concerns and limited maintenance
The API itself is functional for basic Docker Compose operations but error handling is inconsistent—some failures return generic errors that leak internal paths and stack traces, making it difficult to handle failures gracefully without exposing sensitive information. Input validation on compose file parsing is minimal, requiring you to implement your own sanitization layers if you're accepting user-provided configurations.
Authentication and authorization are largely delegated to Docker daemon interactions, which means you need to carefully manage socket permissions and credentials yourself. The library doesn't provide secure-by-default patterns for credential handling, and documentation around secure usage is sparse. For production use, you'd need substantial wrapper code to harden it appropriately.
Best for: Internal tooling in controlled environments where you can invest in security hardening and dependency patching.
Avoid if: You need a maintained library with active CVE response or are building security-sensitive applications handling untrusted input.
Outdated library with security and maintenance concerns
From a practical usage perspective, the API itself is workable for programmatically managing Docker Compose configurations, but error handling is inconsistent and often exposes internal stack traces that can leak information about your infrastructure setup. Input validation on compose file parsing is present but relies on older schema versions, missing modern security directives. The authentication model delegates entirely to Docker daemon socket permissions, which means you need to carefully manage your own authorization layer.
The library does not follow secure-by-default principles in several areas - TLS verification can be disabled too easily, and there's insufficient guidance on hardening configurations. Given the stale maintenance status, I'd recommend using the Docker SDK directly or looking at newer alternatives rather than building on this unmaintained foundation.
Best for: Legacy projects already using this library where migration cost is prohibitive and strict network isolation is enforced.
Avoid if: You're starting a new project or need compliance with modern security standards and active CVE patching.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In