github.com/fyne-io/fyne
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
GUI toolkit with high overhead and limited production-grade controls
Resource management is concerning for long-running applications. Window and widget lifecycle isn't always predictable, and I've encountered scenarios where goroutines spawned by the framework don't clean up properly. There's no connection pooling concept since it's a GUI toolkit, but image caching and resource loading lack sophisticated controls. Error handling tends toward panics rather than graceful degradation—a malformed image or missing font can crash the entire application.
Configuration is inflexible; many behaviors are hardcoded with no environment variable or programmatic override options. Timeout controls are essentially absent. Version 1.4.3 is quite dated (2020), and the API has had breaking changes in subsequent releases that make upgrades painful. For production desktop applications requiring reliability and performance tuning, Fyne lacks the maturity and control surface needed.
Best for: Simple internal tools or prototypes where resource usage and runtime performance aren't critical concerns.
Avoid if: You need production-grade desktop applications with predictable performance, low memory footprint, or fine-grained control over rendering and resource management.
Functional cross-platform GUI, but lacks polish in DX and type safety
Error messages can be cryptic, especially around layout constraints and widget lifecycle issues. When widgets don't render as expected, debugging often requires diving into source code since error output is minimal. The documentation covers basics well but lacks depth on complex scenarios like custom widgets, theme customization, or performance optimization. IDE autocompletion works but provides limited help due to the generic interface types.
Version 1.4.3 from 2020 is significantly outdated (current stable is v2.x), making this review particularly relevant for legacy codebases. Migration paths between major versions have proven breaking and poorly documented, with many API changes requiring manual code audits.
Best for: Simple internal tools or prototypes where cross-platform GUI is needed and modern web-based alternatives are not viable.
Avoid if: You need robust type safety, are building complex data-heavy applications, or require modern DX with strong IDE support and comprehensive error handling.
Functional GUI toolkit but steep learning curve and debugging challenges
Error messages can be frustratingly opaque when layouts don't behave as expected - you'll often see nil pointer panics or silent failures rather than helpful guidance. Debugging layout issues requires mentally visualizing the container tree, and there's no built-in inspector tool. The community is responsive on GitHub issues, but Stack Overflow content is limited, so you'll spend time reading source code to understand undocumented behavior.
Data binding works well when it works, but the examples don't cover common scenarios like binding complex structs or handling validation errors. The package has grown since 1.4.3, but in this version you'll encounter rough edges that require workarounds for production applications.
Best for: Simple cross-platform desktop utilities or internal tools where UI complexity is limited and you value Go-native solutions.
Avoid if: You need complex, production-grade UIs with extensive data binding or require mature tooling and extensive community resources.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In