github.com/grafana/k6
Community Reviews
Solid load testing framework with good security defaults, some gotchas
From a security perspective, k6 handles TLS sensibly with reasonable defaults (TLS 1.2+) and gives you fine-grained control over certificate validation when needed. Input validation is your responsibility when passing data into test scripts - the library won't sanitize JavaScript code for you. Error messages are generally safe and don't leak sensitive information, though custom extensions need careful review. One gotcha: metrics endpoints can expose test parameters and URLs, so be mindful in production environments.
Dependency management is reasonable with a moderately-sized tree. The team is responsive to security issues, though updates sometimes lag behind upstream goja vulnerabilities. Documentation around secure extension development could be more comprehensive.
Best for: Building load testing infrastructure where you need programmatic control over test execution and metrics collection with reasonable security boundaries.
Avoid if: You need to execute completely untrusted user-provided test scripts without additional sandboxing layers or extensive security hardening.
Powerful load testing with JavaScript, excellent docs but Go embedding is niche
The documentation is outstanding for the main use case (JavaScript-based load testing) with tons of examples covering HTTP requests, WebSockets, gRPC, and browser testing. The error messages are helpful and specific, making debugging straightforward. The community is responsive on GitHub and the k6 community forum, though Stack Overflow coverage is lighter since most discussion happens in their dedicated channels.
For day-to-day load testing work, k6 is a joy to use. The JavaScript API is intuitive, thresholds and checks make validation simple, and the local execution with cloud integration option is flexible. However, if you're specifically looking to import k6 as a Go library rather than use it as a CLI tool, be prepared for less documentation and more source code reading.
Best for: Teams needing a modern, scriptable load testing tool with code-based test definitions and CI/CD integration.
Avoid if: You need a traditional Go library for programmatic load testing rather than a CLI tool with JavaScript scripting.
Powerful load testing framework with solid extensibility, some runtime quirks
The built-in metrics and custom metric hooks provide good observability, streaming directly to various backends (Prometheus, InfluxDB, etc). However, debugging failed tests can be frustrating - error context from the JS runtime isn't always detailed, and timeout behaviors aren't consistently documented across all protocol modules. The gRPC and WebSocket implementations sometimes have surprising defaults that bite you in production.
Configuration management is flexible but can become unwieldy with many options split between code, CLI flags, and environment variables. Breaking changes between minor versions have occurred more frequently than expected, particularly around extension APIs and metric output formats. Overall, it's a robust choice for serious load testing despite occasional rough edges.
Best for: Teams needing sophisticated load testing with custom protocols, complex user scenarios, and integration with existing observability infrastructure.
Avoid if: You need simple HTTP benchmarking without scripting complexity or require stable APIs with long-term backward compatibility guarantees.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In