github.com/hashicorp/vault
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Robust secrets management with steep learning curve but excellent security defaults
Error handling is generally good with typed errors that don't leak sensitive information in stack traces. The client properly validates inputs and enforces authentication before operations. Token renewal and lifecycle management are handled transparently, which prevents common authentication pitfalls. The library has responsive CVE handling, with security patches typically released within days of disclosure.
The main challenge is the steep learning curve around Vault's authentication model and the verbosity of constructing clients for different secret engines. Documentation assumes familiarity with Vault concepts, making initial integration slower. Dependency management is reasonable with HashiCorp maintaining tight control over the supply chain, though the transitive dependency tree includes several crypto libraries that require attention during security audits.
Best for: Applications requiring centralized secrets management with strong security guarantees and audit requirements.
Avoid if: You need a simple key-value store without operational overhead or are building a serverless application with cold-start sensitivity.
Functional but verbose API with inconsistent patterns across auth methods
Error handling is functional but generic - you often get opaque errors that require debugging the actual HTTP response. The library doesn't provide typed errors for common scenarios like permission denied or secret not found, so you're left parsing error strings. Documentation exists but leans heavily on examples rather than comprehensive API references, and many edge cases aren't covered.
Type safety is minimal - secrets come back as `map[string]interface{}` requiring manual type assertions everywhere. The lack of generics support (even in recent versions) means you're constantly casting. IDE autocompletion helps with method discovery, but the sheer number of options and similar-sounding methods can be confusing.
Best for: Production applications needing comprehensive Vault integration with all secret engines and willing to write abstraction layers.
Avoid if: You need simple KV secret access only - consider wrapping the API client directly or using a simpler abstraction.
Functional but verbose SDK with inconsistent patterns and limited type safety
Error handling is particularly frustrating. Errors are often opaque string-based messages that require parsing or contain minimal context about what went wrong. When authentication fails or a secret path is incorrect, you're left digging through generic HTTP responses rather than getting structured, actionable error types. The lack of strongly-typed response structs for many operations means you end up working with map[string]interface{} more than you'd like.
That said, it's stable and covers the full Vault feature set. If you need comprehensive Vault integration and can invest time learning its quirks, it works. Just expect to write more boilerplate and helper functions than you'd hope for in a modern Go SDK.
Best for: Applications requiring comprehensive Vault integration where you can afford the learning curve and boilerplate.
Avoid if: You need a quick integration or strongly-typed APIs - consider vault-specific libraries or HTTP client wrappers instead.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In