github.com/junegunn/fzf
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Solid fuzzy finder with minimal operational overhead
Error handling is practical - failed spawns and pipe errors surface clearly, though you'll need to implement your own retry logic for transient failures. The library doesn't include connection pooling concepts since each invocation is stateless. Timeout behavior requires wrapping calls with context.Context yourself. Performance is excellent for interactive use cases (sub-100ms response times typical), but spawning processes repeatedly in tight loops adds overhead.
Configuration is flexible through command-line flag building, but breaking changes between fzf binary versions can bite you if you're not pinning versions. Observability is limited - you get stdout/stderr but no structured logging hooks. For production services doing batch processing, consider alternatives, but for CLI tools and interactive workflows, it's a solid choice.
Best for: CLI tools and interactive applications needing fuzzy selection where spawning subprocesses is acceptable.
Avoid if: You need high-throughput batch processing or cannot manage external binary dependencies in your deployment.
Solid fuzzy finder with minimal security surface but limited input safety tools
The main security consideration is input handling. When embedding fzf, you're responsible for sanitizing what gets passed to it and how results are used. The library doesn't provide built-in input validation or escaping utilities, so shell injection risks exist if you pipe user input directly to commands based on fzf selections. Error messages are straightforward and don't leak sensitive information, but they also don't help catch injection attempts.
Dependency supply chain risk is low—the Go module has zero external dependencies. Updates are regular but CVE response isn't really applicable since the threat model is narrow. The code is clean and auditable, following secure-by-default principles for what it does, though you'll need to layer your own security controls around user input.
Best for: Embedding interactive fuzzy search in CLI tools where you control the input pipeline and need minimal dependencies.
Avoid if: You need a library with built-in input validation and sanitization for untrusted user data.
Solid fuzzy finder with minimal configuration, but watch the process overhead
Performance is excellent for the end-user experience with sub-millisecond search updates even on large datasets (100k+ items). However, the subprocess model adds ~50-100ms startup overhead per invocation, which matters if you're calling fzf repeatedly in tight loops. Memory usage is reasonable, typically under 100MB even with massive lists, though it scales linearly with input size. No connection pooling concerns since it's stateless, but you need proper cleanup of file descriptors and process handles.
Error handling requires wrapping standard exec patterns—parsing exit codes to distinguish user cancellation (exit 130) from actual errors. Timeout control is manual via context.Context. Logging integration is limited; fzf outputs to stderr which you'll need to capture separately. The preview feature can spawn additional subprocesses, so watch your ulimits under concurrent load.
Best for: Interactive CLI tools where users need to search/select from large lists with occasional invocations
Avoid if: You need sub-10ms response times, pure in-process solutions, or programmatic fuzzy matching without user interaction
Sign in to write a review
Sign In