github.com/kataras/iris
Community Reviews
Feature-rich web framework with excellent performance, but watch the module path
The framework provides extensive logging hooks and middleware chains that integrate cleanly with structured logging. Error handling is straightforward with customizable error handlers per route or globally. Timeout configuration is granular - you can set deadlines at server, route, and handler levels. The built-in recovery middleware handles panics gracefully without dropping connections.
One significant gotcha: the module path has changed across versions (kataras/iris/v12 is the current production path, not the 0.0.2 version shown). This versioning confusion has caused import headaches during upgrades. Configuration is flexible via functional options, though some defaults (like read timeout) require explicit setting for production workloads. Documentation is comprehensive but scattered across wiki and examples.
Best for: High-throughput APIs requiring fine-grained control over resource management and performance tuning
Avoid if: You need absolute import path stability or prefer frameworks with stricter backwards compatibility guarantees
Feature-rich but with versioning confusion and learning overhead
The documentation is extensive with many examples, but the learning curve is steeper than alternatives like Echo or Gin due to Iris's unique abstractions and conventions. Error messages are generally helpful when dealing with routing issues, but debugging middleware chains can be opaque. The Context API is powerful but differs significantly from standard library patterns, making it harder to apply general Go web knowledge.
Community support exists but is more limited compared to mainstream alternatives. GitHub issues get responses, though sometimes slowly. Stack Overflow has fewer Iris-specific answers, so you'll often dig through GitHub issues or the framework's own wiki for solutions to non-trivial problems.
Best for: Developers building feature-complete web applications who prefer an opinionated, all-in-one framework over assembling individual libraries.
Avoid if: You prefer lightweight, idiomatic Go solutions or need a large community ecosystem with extensive third-party middleware options.
Feature-rich framework with excellent performance, but watch for API changes
What stands out is the comprehensive feature set - built-in sessions, WebSocket support, view engines, and structured logging hooks all work out of the box. The configuration system is flexible with environment-specific settings and sensible timeout defaults. Error handling is straightforward with customizable error handlers and proper recovery middleware. Observability is good with hooks for metrics and logging at various pipeline stages.
The main pain point is version instability - the project has gone through breaking changes between major versions, and the v0.0.2 versioning is misleading (actual usage typically involves v12.x tags). Once you pin to a specific version, it's stable, but upgrades require careful testing. Documentation is extensive though sometimes outdated for newer features.
Best for: High-performance web applications and APIs where you need a batteries-included framework with strong observability requirements.
Avoid if: You need a minimalist framework with guaranteed API stability or prefer the standard library approach with minimal dependencies.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In