github.com/samber/lo
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Practical utility library with zero-allocation benefits, but watch for slice copying
The performance story is nuanced. Simple operations like Contains or Keys are fast with minimal allocations. However, chaining multiple operations (Filter then Map then Uniq) creates intermediate slice copies each time, which shows up in heap profiles under load. For hot paths processing large slices, you'll want to write custom loops. The library also lacks any retry logic, timeouts, or error wrapping - it's purely functional transformations, so error handling remains your responsibility.
In practice, lo shines for readability in business logic where performance isn't critical. API handlers, config processing, and response transformations benefit greatly. For high-throughput data pipelines or request-critical paths, measure first - the convenience sometimes costs more allocations than manual iteration.
Best for: Business logic, API layers, and configuration processing where code clarity matters more than microsecond performance.
Avoid if: You're building high-throughput data pipelines or need sub-millisecond latency in hot paths with large collections.
Convenient functional utilities with minimal security surface area
The library follows secure-by-default principles through its immutability patterns - functions like Map, Filter, and Uniq return new slices rather than mutating input. This prevents entire classes of bugs where shared state causes unintended side effects. Error handling is explicit where needed (like in ForEach error variants), though most functions panic on nil dereferences which requires defensive coding.
From a supply chain perspective, the zero-dependency approach is ideal. No transitive CVE risk to manage. The code is straightforward to audit - it's essentially safe transformations on built-in types. Input validation is your responsibility as these are low-level primitives, but there's no parsing or deserialization that could introduce injection vulnerabilities. The biggest gotcha is accidentally using these in hot paths without considering allocations, but that's a performance concern rather than security.
Best for: Data transformation pipelines where reducing boilerplate is valuable and supply chain security is a priority.
Avoid if: You need guaranteed error handling without panics or are working in extremely performance-critical paths where allocations matter.
Practical utility belt with negligible overhead, but watch allocations
In practice, the zero-config nature is both strength and limitation. Functions like Chunk, Uniq, and Keys eliminate boilerplate, but there's no way to tune behavior—no capacity hints, no in-place operations, no context cancellation for long-running transforms. Error handling follows Go conventions (return tuples with errors), which is fine but means you can't short-circuit chains elegantly.
Observability is non-existent—no hooks for tracing or metrics. For high-throughput pipelines processing thousands of items per second, profile carefully. For typical CRUD operations and business logic, it's a productivity win that doesn't introduce mysterious runtime costs.
Best for: Business logic, API handlers, and data transformation pipelines where readability matters more than microsecond-level optimization.
Avoid if: You're processing high-volume streams where allocation overhead matters, or need observable/cancellable data pipelines.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In