github.com/spf13/cobra
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Robust CLI framework with solid defaults, but security requires manual attention
From a security perspective, input validation is your responsibility—Cobra provides flag parsing but you must validate user input explicitly. This is both a strength (no hidden magic) and a risk (easy to forget). The framework doesn't include authentication/authorization primitives, which makes sense for a CLI builder but means you'll implement these from scratch. Command injection risks exist if you shell out with user input, standard Go concerns apply.
Dependency-wise, Cobra has minimal transitive dependencies and the maintainers respond to issues reasonably. The library follows secure-by-default principles where applicable: no automatic command execution, explicit flag binding, and no eval-style functionality. You control what gets executed.
Best for: Building production CLI tools where you need explicit control over input validation and command execution flow.
Avoid if: You need built-in authentication/authorization frameworks or automatic input sanitization without manual validation.
Solid CLI framework but requires careful input validation discipline
From a security perspective, Cobra is mostly unopinionated, which cuts both ways. It doesn't do automatic input validation or sanitization - you're responsible for validating all Args and flag values. The PreRunE/RunE pattern makes error handling explicit, which is good, but default error messages can leak command structure details to attackers if you're not careful about wrapping them. The library itself has a clean dependency tree (primarily pflag and yaml) which reduces supply chain risk, and the maintainers have been responsive to security issues historically.
The biggest gotcha is that shell completion generation can execute arbitrary code if you're not careful with custom completion functions. You need to be defensive about validating completion inputs, especially if your CLI interacts with external systems during tab completion.
Best for: Building production CLI tools where you need solid command structure and are willing to implement your own input validation layer.
Avoid if: You need automatic input sanitization or schema validation built into the framework itself.
Battle-tested CLI framework with minimal overhead and excellent ergonomics
The viper integration works but creates coupling if you're not careful—I've debugged config precedence issues where environment variables and flags interact unexpectedly. Context propagation improved in recent versions but still requires manual plumbing through command chains. Error handling is straightforward: SilenceErrors and SilenceUsage flags let you control output, though the default of printing usage on any error is annoying in production.
Configuration is code-based which I prefer for type safety, but there's no built-in support for timeouts, retries, or graceful shutdown—you wire that yourself. The lack of observability hooks means I typically wrap Execute() to add metrics and structured logging. Breaking changes between minor versions have been rare in my experience, though the 1.0 to 1.1 transition changed some flag binding behavior.
Best for: Building CLIs of any complexity where you need subcommand hierarchies and want minimal runtime overhead.
Avoid if: You need a batteries-included framework with built-in retry logic, observability, or prefer declarative/struct-tag based command definitions.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In