github.com/urfave/cli
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Solid CLI framework with minimal boilerplate, but v1/v2 confusion hurts
The biggest pain point is the v1/v2 split. Many examples and Stack Overflow answers reference v2 (github.com/urfave/cli/v2), but if you're using v1, the API differences can trip you up. Context handling changed significantly between versions. Documentation exists but feels scattered - the README has examples, but finding patterns for middleware-like functionality or complex flag dependencies requires digging through issues.
Day-to-day, it's productive. Common tasks like environment variable fallbacks, required flags, and help text generation work smoothly. The framework stays out of your way until you need advanced features, where documentation becomes thinner. Community support is decent - GitHub issues get responses, though not always quickly.
Best for: Building standard CLI applications with flags, subcommands, and environment variables where you need more structure than flag package but less complexity than Cobra.
Avoid if: You need extensive built-in generators, plugin systems, or are building highly complex CLIs with deep nesting and intricate workflows.
Solid CLI framework with minimal security footprint, but requires vigilance
From a security standpoint, error handling is one area requiring attention. Default error messages can be verbose and may leak internal path information or command structure details if you're not careful about wrapping errors before display. The library doesn't do authentication or authorization—it's purely a CLI parser—so you need to implement those yourself for sensitive operations. The maintainers respond reasonably to security issues, though the v1 branch is in maintenance mode.
The library follows secure-by-default principles in that it doesn't introduce crypto weaknesses or network operations, but it won't protect you from writing insecure command handlers. Input validation is your responsibility.
Best for: Building CLI tools where you need minimal dependencies and full control over input validation and error handling.
Avoid if: You need extensive built-in input sanitization or are starting new projects that should use v2 API.
Functional but showing its age - v2 is the better choice
Error messages are functional but bare-bones - you'll often find yourself wrapping errors to provide better context to users. The documentation covers basics adequately but lacks depth on common patterns like subcommand composition or custom flag types. IDE support is acceptable since it's all struct-based, but you lose type safety in several places where interface{} is used.
The real issue is that v2 exists and is significantly better, yet v1 continues to be maintained separately. This creates an awkward situation where you're using a legacy API that won't see modern improvements. Migration to v2 requires non-trivial rewrites due to API changes.
Best for: Maintaining existing projects already on v1 where migration cost outweighs benefits of v2's improvements.
Avoid if: You're starting a new CLI project - begin with v2 instead to get better APIs and active feature development.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In