github.com/zeromicro/go-zero
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Production-ready microservices framework with excellent observability but some rigidity
The logging hooks integrate cleanly with OpenTelemetry, and the built-in metrics collection (via Prometheus) requires minimal setup. Request tracing propagates automatically through RPC calls. However, the framework's code generation tooling (goctl) creates a lot of boilerplate that becomes difficult to customize when your needs diverge from the standard patterns.
Resource management is generally excellent - graceful shutdown works reliably, and timeout configurations cascade properly through contexts. The default 3-second timeout on RPC calls caught us off guard initially. Breaking changes between minor versions have been minimal since 1.4, though the API surface is large enough that dependency updates require careful testing.
Best for: Teams building new microservices architectures who want batteries-included observability and proven load-handling patterns.
Avoid if: You need fine-grained control over project structure or are integrating into existing codebases with established patterns.
Opinionated microservice framework with strong security defaults
The automatic parameter binding includes basic SQL injection protection and the framework enforces timeouts across all service calls by default. Error handling is somewhat opinionated - it automatically wraps errors in structured responses, which is good for consistency but can leak stack traces in non-production environments if you're not careful with the logging configuration.
Dependency management is reasonable with a focused set of core dependencies, though the framework does pull in etcd and grpc libraries even if you're only building REST services. The team responds to CVEs fairly quickly, and TLS configuration for gRPC services uses modern defaults (TLS 1.2+ with strong cipher suites). The middleware chain makes it easy to add custom authorization logic without bypassing framework protections.
Best for: Teams building microservices who want security guardrails and consistent patterns without extensive custom middleware.
Avoid if: You need fine-grained control over every aspect of request handling or prefer minimal framework magic.
Opinionated microservices framework with excellent tooling but steep learning curve
The framework is heavily opinionated about project structure, which helps consistency but requires investment to understand their way of doing things. Documentation has improved but still assumes familiarity with microservices patterns. The English documentation can be sparse, though Chinese docs are more comprehensive. Error messages from goctl are generally helpful, pointing to line numbers in .api files when definitions are malformed.
Community support is active on GitHub issues with maintainers responding within days. Stack Overflow coverage is limited, so you'll rely more on GitHub discussions and examples. The framework shines when building distributed systems with service discovery and resilience patterns, but feels heavyweight for simple REST APIs.
Best for: Teams building distributed microservices architectures who value consistency and built-in resilience patterns over flexibility.
Avoid if: You need a lightweight framework for simple REST APIs or prefer learning from extensive English tutorials and examples.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In