@electron-forge/maker-base
Base maker for Electron Forge
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Solid foundation for custom makers, but requires deep Electron Forge knowledge
However, the learning curve is steeper than expected because the documentation is sparse. You'll spend time digging through existing maker implementations on GitHub to understand patterns like artifact handling, config typing, and platform-specific logic. Error messages are decent but generic - if your `make()` function fails, you get standard JS errors without much Forge-specific guidance.
The package does what it promises, but feels like it assumes you're already deep in the Electron Forge ecosystem. If you're creating a one-off custom maker for your project, expect to reference the source code of official makers frequently. Community support is limited since this is a niche use case - most developers use pre-built makers.
Best for: Teams building custom distribution formats or packaging solutions not covered by Electron Forge's built-in makers.
Avoid if: You're new to Electron Forge or can accomplish your goals with existing official makers (DMG, Squirrel, Snap, etc.).
Functional base class but minimal docs and TypeScript quirks
The TypeScript support is present but inconsistent. Generic types for config objects help with IntelliSense, but error messages when you misconfigure something are often cryptic. The base class handles some platform checks and file operations, saving boilerplate, but there's no clear guide on edge cases like handling symlinks or managing temporary directories.
Migration between versions has been smooth in my experience, though breaking changes aren't always well-documented. You're better off treating this as an internal Electron Forge API rather than a stable public interface. For simple makers it works fine, but complex scenarios require digging through source code.
Best for: Teams already invested in Electron Forge who need to extend packaging with custom build outputs or installers.
Avoid if: You need well-documented APIs or are building your first Electron tooling - start with built-in makers instead.
Solid foundation but documentation gaps make custom maker development challenging
The main pain point is documentation. While the source code is readable, there's minimal guidance on implementing custom makers beyond studying existing maker implementations in the monorepo. Error messages when you misconfigure something are generic Node.js errors rather than helpful, context-aware feedback. You'll spend time digging through the electron-forge codebase to understand expected behavior patterns.
IDE autocomplete works well thanks to TypeScript, but the lack of inline JSDoc comments means you're often hovering over method signatures without understanding their purpose or requirements. For straightforward maker implementations it's adequate, but complex custom packaging scenarios require significant trial-and-error.
Best for: Teams building custom Electron packaging workflows who are comfortable reading source code and have experience with Electron Forge internals.
Avoid if: You need well-documented APIs with examples or are new to Electron Forge's architecture and maker system.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In