@module-federation/rspack
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Powerful Module Federation for Rspack, but rough edges remain
Error messages can be cryptic when things go wrong, especially around remote module loading failures or version mismatches. Debugging requires diving into the runtime code more often than I'd like. The package is evolving rapidly, which means breaking changes between minor versions have caught me off guard. GitHub issues get responses, but many remain open with workarounds rather than fixes.
When everything works, the performance benefits of Rspack shine through. Simple host-remote setups are straightforward, but complex scenarios like shared dependency versioning or dynamic remotes require trial and error. The community is growing but Stack Overflow coverage is sparse, so expect to rely heavily on GitHub issues and Discord for help.
Best for: Teams already familiar with Module Federation who need faster build times and are comfortable troubleshooting through GitHub issues.
Avoid if: You need stable APIs for production or require extensive documentation and examples for complex micro-frontend architectures.
Powerful module federation for Rspack, but documentation and DX need work
The TypeScript types are present but often too generic, making it difficult to discover available options through IDE autocomplete. Error messages when misconfiguring remotes or shared dependencies can be cryptic, often requiring deep debugging to understand what went wrong. The documentation exists but lacks the depth needed for non-trivial scenarios—you'll find yourself reading source code or searching for community examples frequently.
Migration from @module-federation/enhanced or native Webpack module federation requires careful attention, as some configuration patterns differ subtly. The getting-started examples are functional but minimal, leaving you to figure out production concerns like error boundaries, loading states, and type sharing on your own.
Best for: Teams already using Rspack who need module federation and are comfortable debugging configuration issues independently.
Avoid if: You're new to module federation or need extensive documentation and examples for production-ready implementations.
Powerful but rough around the edges for federated Rspack builds
Once you get past initial setup, the core functionality works reliably for straightforward use cases. Remote module loading and shared dependencies behave as expected when properly configured. However, debugging runtime issues can be challenging since errors may surface as generic "Cannot read property" messages without clear indication that federation is involved.
Community support is growing but limited compared to webpack alternatives. GitHub issues get responses but can take time. Stack Overflow content is sparse, so you'll rely heavily on existing examples and GitHub discussions. The package is actively maintained but feels like it's still maturing—expect to consult the source code occasionally.
Best for: Teams already familiar with Module Federation who need Rspack's build performance and are comfortable troubleshooting through source code.
Avoid if: You're new to Module Federation or need extensive documentation and community support for quick onboarding.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In