@testing-library/jest-native
Custom jest matchers to test the state of React Native
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Essential matchers that make React Native testing feel natural and readable
The TypeScript support is excellent with full autocompletion in IDEs, making it easy to discover available matchers as you type. Error messages are clear and actionable, showing you what was expected versus what was received. The matchers handle React Native's prop patterns naturally (like `accessible`, `accessibilityState`, etc.), which saves you from writing custom assertions repeatedly.
One minor gotcha: you need to ensure your components are properly rendered with @testing-library/react-native for these matchers to work correctly. The documentation could be more comprehensive with edge cases, but the API surface is intuitive enough that you rarely need to reference docs after initial setup.
Best for: React Native projects using @testing-library/react-native that want readable, maintainable test assertions without custom matcher boilerplate.
Avoid if: You're using alternative testing frameworks like Detox for E2E or not using @testing-library/react-native for component testing.
Intuitive matchers that make React Native testing feel natural
TypeScript support is solid with excellent autocompletion in VS Code. When a matcher fails, error messages clearly show what was expected versus received, including the actual element props. Setup is straightforward—just import in your jest setup file and you're done. The documentation provides clear examples for each matcher, though I wish there were more real-world scenarios showing multiple matchers combined.
The main gotcha is remembering which matchers work with React Native's component model versus web DOM. For instance, `toBeEmpty()` behaves differently than you might expect from the DOM version. Also, some edge cases around nested Text components can produce confusing results that require digging into the implementation.
Best for: React Native projects using @testing-library/react-native that need expressive, readable assertions for component state and accessibility properties.
Avoid if: You're using a different testing approach like Detox for E2E tests or need matchers for platform-specific native modules beyond standard RN components.
Solid testing utility with minimal security surface area
Day-to-day usage is straightforward: import the matchers, and you get cleaner test assertions like `expect(element).toBeVisible()` instead of querying style props manually. The error messages are developer-friendly without leaking sensitive information, though they could be more descriptive when assertions fail on complex component trees. The library follows secure-by-default principles by being a passive observer with no configuration options that could introduce vulnerabilities.
The main security consideration is its position in your dependency tree. It's a leaf dependency with minimal transitive dependencies, reducing supply chain risk. No authentication, network operations, or user input handling means there's virtually no attack surface. Updates are infrequent but that's fine given its narrow scope and stability.
Best for: React Native projects using Jest that need cleaner, more readable component state assertions in test suites.
Avoid if: You're using a different test runner like Vitest or need matchers for web-only React features.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In