ansi-gray
The color gray, in ansi.
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Minimal single-purpose utility, but obsolete and unnecessary in modern workflows
From an operations perspective, this is dead weight. No configuration options, no logging hooks, no error handling to speak of (though admittedly there's little that can fail). The package hasn't been updated since 2015, which raises supply chain concerns even for something this trivial. In production, you're adding a dependency node for something you could inline in two lines of code.
The real issue is opportunity cost: modern terminal libraries like chalk or picocolors offer the same functionality with better performance, broader color support, automatic TTY detection, and active maintenance. There's no resource management to discuss because there are no resources—it's a pure function. But that also means no flexibility for different terminal types, no graceful degradation, and no observability into whether colors are even supported in your environment.
Best for: Legacy projects already using it where removing dependencies isn't worth the effort.
Avoid if: You're starting a new project or care about dependency hygiene, supply chain security, or having actively maintained dependencies.
Overly simplistic single-color wrapper with better modern alternatives
In practice, you'll quickly outgrow this if you need any other colors or formatting. The lack of documentation means you're guessing about edge cases - what happens with nested calls, how it handles non-string inputs, or whether it works in environments without color support. Error messages are non-existent because the code is so minimal it barely validates anything.
The real issue is that modern alternatives like chalk or ansi-colors provide gray (and every other color) with better terminal detection, proper nesting support, and active maintenance. Using ansi-gray means adding a dependency for something that could be a one-liner with a more comprehensive library you likely already have installed.
Best for: Legacy projects already using this package where removing it isn't worth the effort.
Avoid if: You're starting a new project or need any terminal colors beyond gray - use chalk or ansi-colors instead.
Minimal single-purpose utility with no maintenance or modern features
From an operations perspective, this adds an unnecessary dependency to your tree for functionality that chalk, picocolors, or even native console methods handle better. There's no error handling, no fallback for non-TTY environments, and no way to customize the shade of gray or disable output. The package hasn't been updated since 2015, meaning it predates modern terminal capabilities and doesn't handle edge cases like Windows console compatibility.
For production systems where dependency management, supply chain security, and maintainability matter, pulling in a package for a single ANSI code is poor engineering practice. You're better off using a maintained color library or writing the escape sequence directly if you truly only need gray.
Best for: Legacy projects already using it where removing dependencies isn't worth the effort.
Avoid if: You're building any new project or care about dependency hygiene and modern terminal support.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In