graphql-config
The easiest way to configure your development environment with your GraphQL schema (supported by most tools, editors & IDEs)
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Solid foundation for GraphQL tooling with good IDE integration
The TypeScript support is solid with proper type definitions, and the API for programmatically loading configs (`loadConfig`) works reliably. Schema loading from various sources (files, URLs, code-first) is flexible and handles common scenarios well. Error messages are generally helpful when the config file has syntax issues or schema loading fails.
The main friction point is documentation—while the basics are covered, more complex scenarios like multiple projects, custom loaders, or programmatic usage require digging through examples or source code. Migration between major versions (3.x to 4.x to 5.x) involved breaking changes that weren't always well-documented. Once configured though, it just works and becomes invisible infrastructure.
Best for: Teams using multiple GraphQL tools and IDE extensions that need centralized schema configuration across their development environment.
Avoid if: You only use a single GraphQL tool or prefer tool-specific configuration files over centralized setup.
Solid config management for GraphQL toolchains, but adds some overhead
The library handles both local and remote schema loading reasonably well, with support for headers and custom loaders. However, the abstraction comes with runtime overhead - loading configurations can add noticeable startup time to CLI tools, especially when dealing with remote schemas. The caching behavior isn't always transparent, and I've hit cases where stale configs caused confusing errors that required manual intervention.
Error messages have improved significantly in recent versions, but debugging config resolution issues still requires diving into the multi-layered loader system. The package handles file watching and hot reloading for development workflows, though memory usage can creep up in long-running processes. Configuration flexibility is excellent with support for multiple projects and extensions, but this complexity means initial setup requires careful thought about your team's workflow.
Best for: Teams using multiple GraphQL tools (codegen, linting, IDE extensions) that need centralized schema configuration management.
Avoid if: You have a single simple use case or need minimal startup overhead in performance-critical CLI tools.
Useful config abstraction but watch for schema loading and error leaks
However, from a security standpoint, there are notable concerns. Remote schema loading doesn't enforce TLS by default or validate certificates explicitly in configuration. Error messages can leak endpoint URLs and auth header structures when introspection fails. The library will happily load schemas from arbitrary URLs specified in config without clear guardrails. Input validation on config files is minimal—malformed YAML or circular references can produce cryptic errors that expose file paths.
Dependency-wise, it pulls in a substantial tree including older loaders that haven't always had timely CVE responses. For production tooling or CI/CD that processes untrusted configs, you'll need to add your own validation layer and carefully control what endpoints are allowed.
Best for: Developer tooling in trusted environments where you control all schema sources and config files.
Avoid if: You need to process untrusted configs, load schemas from user-supplied URLs, or require strict supply chain security guarantees.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In