karma-spec-reporter
A Karma plugin. Report all spec-results to console (like mocha's spec reporter).
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Simple spec reporter that works but lacks modern DX features
However, the developer experience feels dated. There are no TypeScript types (not even in DefinitelyTyped), so you get zero autocompletion or type safety in your Karma config. Configuration options are minimal and underdocumented - you'll need to dig through the source or trial-and-error to customize behavior. Error messages are generic Karma errors rather than anything helpful from the reporter itself.
The package hasn't seen active development recently, and while it's stable for what it does, don't expect modern features like custom formatters, programmatic output handling, or integration with newer test runners. It's functional maintenance mode software - reliable but stagnant.
Best for: Simple Karma-based projects that need basic spec-style console output without customization requirements.
Avoid if: You need TypeScript support, extensive configuration options, or are working on a greenfield project where modern alternatives exist.
Simple test reporter with minimal maintenance and security considerations
From a security perspective, this package has minimal attack surface since it only processes test output strings and writes to console. However, the last update was in 2022, and the dependency tree hasn't seen recent maintenance. There's no input validation documentation, though the risk is low given its narrow scope. The library doesn't handle sensitive data directly, but be aware that it will echo any data included in test descriptions or error messages to console output, which could inadvertently expose secrets if tests aren't written carefully.
The codebase is small and transparent, making it easy to audit, but the lack of recent updates means you're unlikely to see prompt CVE responses if issues arise. For a dev-only dependency with limited scope, the risk is acceptable but worth monitoring.
Best for: Projects needing prettier Karma test output where dependencies are actively monitored and tests don't include sensitive data in descriptions.
Avoid if: You need actively maintained dependencies or run tests that might inadvertently include credentials in output without sanitization.
Simple, effective spec reporter that just works with minimal setup
The day-to-day experience is solid. Test results are clearly organized by describe blocks, with passing tests in green and failures prominently displayed in red with full error details. The indentation makes nested test suites easy to scan. When tests fail, you get stack traces and assertion details right where you expect them. The reporter handles large test suites without performance issues.
The main limitation is documentation - the README is bare-bones, covering only basic setup. Advanced options like custom prefixes or suppressing certain output exist but require digging through the source or trial-and-error. Error messages are minimal since there's not much to configure wrong. Community support is light; you'll find scattered Stack Overflow mentions but GitHub issues get sporadic responses. Still, for its core purpose, it delivers reliably.
Best for: Projects needing a clean, Mocha-style spec reporter for Karma tests with minimal configuration overhead.
Avoid if: You need extensive customization options or require active community support for troubleshooting edge cases.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In