loader.js
loader.js =========
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Lightweight AMD loader showing its age - limited modern tooling support
The API is straightforward - define() and require() work as expected with minimal magic. Performance is decent for small module graphs, but there's no built-in resource pooling for concurrent requests, so you'll hit browser connection limits quickly with deep dependency trees. Error handling is basic: failed module loads throw errors but provide limited context for debugging in production. No retry logic exists out of the box.
Configuration is bare-bones with limited timeout control and no hooks for observability. You can't easily instrument module load times or track resolution failures without wrapping the global define/require. The lack of source map support and integration with modern build tools makes this a poor fit for contemporary JavaScript projects. If you're working with legacy AMD codebases, it functions, but newer module systems offer far better operational characteristics.
Best for: Maintaining legacy AMD-based applications where module bundling isn't an option.
Avoid if: You're building new projects or need modern tooling support, observability, or any production-grade operational features.
Functional AMD loader but dated, limited observability, no modern tooling support
From an operations perspective, the observability story is weak. There's no built-in instrumentation for tracking load times, no hooks for monitoring failed module fetches, and error messages are terse when circular dependencies or network issues occur. Timeout behavior isn't configurable—you're at the mercy of browser defaults. Resource management is basic; there's no connection pooling concept here since it's just script tag injection, but you also can't limit concurrent requests or implement retry logic without wrapping everything yourself.
For greenfield projects, modern bundlers like webpack/vite have completely superseded this approach. If you're maintaining legacy AMD codecs, it does the job, but expect to build your own logging and error handling layers around it.
Best for: Maintaining existing legacy AMD-based applications where migration isn't feasible
Avoid if: You're starting a new project or need production observability and modern toolchain integration
Abandoned AMD module loader with outdated practices and security concerns
The library's error handling is basic at best - failed module loads produce generic errors that don't help distinguish between network failures, script errors, or dependency resolution issues. This makes debugging production issues frustrating and can inadvertently expose path information. There's no built-in mechanism for validating module sources or enforcing allowlists, which creates supply chain risk when loading third-party modules.
From a maintenance standpoint, the lack of updates means no CVE response history to evaluate, and you're on your own if security issues arise. Modern bundlers like webpack, Rollup, or esbuild provide better tree-shaking, security controls, and active maintenance. If you're stuck maintaining legacy code using loader.js, budget time for migration rather than deepening the dependency.
Best for: Maintaining legacy applications already using AMD modules where migration isn't immediately feasible.
Avoid if: Starting new projects or when security compliance, active maintenance, or modern bundling features are required.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In