nanocolors
4x times faster than chalk and use 5x less space in node_modules
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Minimal, performant terminal colors with basic API - lacks modern DX polish
The developer experience is bare-bones but functional. There's no TypeScript bundled in the package itself, though DefinitelyTyped provides basic types. The API is simple enough that autocomplete shows available colors, but you won't get rich IntelliSense. Error handling is minimal - pass it non-strings and you'll get runtime errors without helpful messages. Documentation is sparse; you'll rely on the README examples and your knowledge of ANSI color names.
For straightforward CLI coloring needs, it's a solid choice that won't bloat your dependencies. Just don't expect the ergonomic niceties of more established libraries. The migration from chalk is trivial for basic usage, though template literal syntax requires adjustment.
Best for: Performance-sensitive CLIs and build tools where bundle size matters and basic terminal coloring suffices.
Avoid if: You need rich formatting features, comprehensive TypeScript support out-of-the-box, or expect detailed error messages for debugging.
Minimalist color library that just works, but documentation is sparse
The biggest challenge is the minimal documentation. The README shows basic examples, but when you hit edge cases or need to understand color support detection, you're reading source code. Error messages are JavaScript defaults - there's no hand-holding if you pass wrong types. That said, the library is so simple (under 200 lines) that debugging is straightforward. TypeScript definitions are included and accurate.
Community support is limited given the smaller user base. GitHub issues get responses but slowly. Stack Overflow has almost no nanocolors-specific content. For common use cases like coloring CLI output, it's completely straightforward and reliable. The lack of dependencies means no supply chain concerns, which is a real advantage.
Best for: CLI tools and scripts where bundle size matters and you need basic terminal coloring with chalk-like syntax.
Avoid if: You need comprehensive documentation, active community support, or advanced terminal formatting features beyond basic colors and styles.
Minimal, dependency-free terminal coloring with excellent supply chain security
In daily use, it's refreshingly simple. No fancy features, no plugin system, no configuration objects - just pure functions that take strings and return colored strings. The lack of dependencies means faster installs and fewer supply chain concerns during security audits. Error handling is non-existent because there's nothing to error on: invalid inputs just get stringified and colored anyway.
The main trade-off is age: last updated in 2021, though for such a focused library this isn't necessarily concerning. The code is stable and the problem space hasn't changed. For security-conscious teams doing CLI tools or logging, the minimal footprint and zero-dependency approach makes this an easy choice over heavier alternatives.
Best for: Security-conscious teams building CLI tools or logging systems where supply chain risk matters more than advanced formatting features.
Avoid if: You need active maintenance guarantees, complex color compositions, or built-in TypeScript definitions.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In