postcss-markdown
★
★
★
★
★
3
reviews
PostCSS syntax for parsing Markdown
100
Security
40
Quality
30
Maintenance
60
Overall
v1.3.1
npm
JavaScript
Jan 13, 2026
by gucong
No Known Issues
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
5
GitHub Stars
3.0/5
Avg Rating
Community Reviews
CAUTION
Functional but minimal security considerations for Markdown CSS parsing
postcss-markdown enables PostCSS processing of CSS within Markdown files, primarily for linting style blocks in documentation. In practice, it's a narrow-use utility that does its job but requires careful consideration around input handling. The parser extracts CSS from code fences and HTML style tags, which means you're trusting user-controlled content in your build pipeline.
From a security standpoint, the library is essentially a thin wrapper around parsing logic with limited input validation. There's no explicit sanitization of the extracted CSS before passing to PostCSS, so you're relying entirely on PostCSS's own parsing safeguards. Error messages can expose file paths and content snippets, which may leak internal structure in CI/CD environments. The dependency chain is relatively small, but there's minimal CVE response history to evaluate.
For static documentation builds where you control the Markdown source, it works fine. However, if you're processing user-generated Markdown or untrusted content, you need additional validation layers. The library follows no particular secure-by-default principles—it assumes trusted input.
From a security standpoint, the library is essentially a thin wrapper around parsing logic with limited input validation. There's no explicit sanitization of the extracted CSS before passing to PostCSS, so you're relying entirely on PostCSS's own parsing safeguards. Error messages can expose file paths and content snippets, which may leak internal structure in CI/CD environments. The dependency chain is relatively small, but there's minimal CVE response history to evaluate.
For static documentation builds where you control the Markdown source, it works fine. However, if you're processing user-generated Markdown or untrusted content, you need additional validation layers. The library follows no particular secure-by-default principles—it assumes trusted input.
Minimal dependency footprint reduces supply chain attack surface
Simple API with straightforward PostCSS syntax integration
Works reliably for controlled documentation linting workflows
No input validation or sanitization of extracted CSS blocks
Error messages expose file paths and content details
Lacks documentation on security considerations for untrusted input
Best for: Linting CSS in controlled documentation repositories where all Markdown sources are trusted.
Avoid if: You need to process user-generated Markdown or require defense-in-depth input validation.
CAUTION
Functional but bare-bones PostCSS syntax parser for Markdown files
postcss-markdown does what it says on the tin: it allows PostCSS to parse CSS within Markdown files, typically in fenced code blocks. The setup is straightforward - configure it as a custom syntax in your PostCSS config and it extracts CSS from markdown for linting or transformation. This is particularly useful when you want to run stylelint on CSS examples in documentation.
The API is minimalist to a fault. There's no TypeScript support, no exported types, and the documentation is sparse. You'll find yourself reading the source code to understand edge cases like how it handles multiple code blocks or language identifiers. Error messages when parsing fails are generic PostCSS errors that don't indicate the Markdown context clearly.
In practice, it works reliably for straightforward use cases - running stylelint on docs or processing CSS in .md files. However, the lack of configuration options means you can't customize which code blocks to parse or how to handle malformed CSS without wrapping it in additional tooling.
The API is minimalist to a fault. There's no TypeScript support, no exported types, and the documentation is sparse. You'll find yourself reading the source code to understand edge cases like how it handles multiple code blocks or language identifiers. Error messages when parsing fails are generic PostCSS errors that don't indicate the Markdown context clearly.
In practice, it works reliably for straightforward use cases - running stylelint on docs or processing CSS in .md files. However, the lack of configuration options means you can't customize which code blocks to parse or how to handle malformed CSS without wrapping it in additional tooling.
Drop-in syntax plugin that integrates seamlessly with existing PostCSS pipelines
Correctly extracts CSS from fenced code blocks with css/scss/less language tags
Stable behavior with no dependencies beyond PostCSS itself
Works well with stylelint for linting CSS examples in documentation
Zero TypeScript definitions or type support for modern workflows
Minimal documentation with no examples of edge cases or configuration options
Error messages don't provide Markdown-specific context (line numbers relative to code blocks, not original file)
Best for: Running PostCSS tools like stylelint on CSS code blocks in Markdown documentation files.
Avoid if: You need TypeScript support, detailed error reporting, or customization of which code blocks to process.
CAUTION
Niche syntax plugin that works but requires careful configuration
postcss-markdown does what it claims - parses CSS within Markdown code blocks for PostCSS processing. In practice, it's a specialized tool for linting or transforming CSS embedded in documentation. The integration is straightforward: pass it as a syntax to PostCSS or stylelint. However, it's purely a parser with zero configuration options for resource management, error handling, or performance tuning.
From an operations standpoint, this package is essentially stateless transformation logic with no connection pooling, timeout settings, or retry mechanisms to configure - which is appropriate for its scope but means you're entirely dependent on PostCSS's own behavior. Error messages when parsing fails can be cryptic, often just generic PostCSS parse errors without context about which Markdown file or code block caused the issue. No logging hooks or observability built in.
Memory usage is negligible for typical documentation files, but processing large Markdown files with many code blocks happens synchronously with no streaming support. Works fine in CI pipelines for stylelint validation, but don't expect production-grade features.
From an operations standpoint, this package is essentially stateless transformation logic with no connection pooling, timeout settings, or retry mechanisms to configure - which is appropriate for its scope but means you're entirely dependent on PostCSS's own behavior. Error messages when parsing fails can be cryptic, often just generic PostCSS parse errors without context about which Markdown file or code block caused the issue. No logging hooks or observability built in.
Memory usage is negligible for typical documentation files, but processing large Markdown files with many code blocks happens synchronously with no streaming support. Works fine in CI pipelines for stylelint validation, but don't expect production-grade features.
Simple integration requiring only syntax configuration in PostCSS/stylelint
Zero dependencies beyond PostCSS itself keeps the footprint minimal
Handles common markdown flavors and fenced code blocks reliably
No configuration options for timeout, concurrency, or error handling behavior
Parse errors lack context about which Markdown file or block failed
No streaming support for processing large files efficiently
Best for: Linting CSS in documentation files as part of CI pipelines with modest file sizes.
Avoid if: You need production-grade error handling, observability, or processing of large Markdown files at scale.
Write a Review
Sign in to write a review
Sign In
Dependencies