vega-force
Force simulation transform for Vega dataflows.
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Specialized force simulation engine with minimal security surface
The main security consideration is input validation. The library expects well-formed numeric data and will throw runtime errors on malformed inputs, but these errors don't expose sensitive information—they're straightforward TypeError or NaN propagation issues. You'll want to sanitize upstream data before feeding it to the force simulation, particularly when dealing with user-supplied graph structures. The dependency tree is relatively shallow, mostly other Vega packages, which reduces supply chain exposure.
In practice, it's stable and predictable. The BSD-3-Clause license is permissive and well-understood. Updates are infrequent but that reflects API stability rather than abandonment. For visualization pipelines, it does exactly what it promises without surprises.
Best for: Data visualization pipelines where you need force-directed layouts and already validate inputs upstream.
Avoid if: You need a standalone graph layout engine with built-in input sanitization and validation.
Powerful but niche: Force simulations tightly coupled to Vega ecosystem
The API surface is minimal and functional, but documentation assumes deep familiarity with Vega's transform architecture. There's no dedicated documentation site—you'll be reading source code or referring to Vega's broader docs. TypeScript definitions exist but are basic, offering limited guidance on parameter shapes and transform configurations. Error messages tend to be cryptic when configurations are malformed, often failing silently or throwing generic dataflow errors.
For teams already invested in Vega's ecosystem, this does what it needs to. For everyone else, d3-force provides better DX, documentation, and flexibility. The getting-started experience is rough unless you're already comfortable with Vega's transform paradigm.
Best for: Teams building complex visualizations within the Vega/Vega-Lite ecosystem who need force-directed layouts.
Avoid if: You need a standalone force simulation library or aren't already committed to the Vega visualization framework.
Powerful graph layout engine but demanding on resources and difficult to tune
Performance is the elephant in the room. With datasets over a few hundred nodes, you'll see noticeable frame drops and UI blocking since simulations run synchronously on the main thread. There's no built-in web worker support or streaming results. Memory usage scales predictably but can spike during layout recalculations. The simulation doesn't expose granular observability hooks, making it hard to instrument when things slow down under load.
Timeout and iteration controls exist but require manual tuning per dataset. The transform doesn't fail gracefully with malformed data - expect cryptic errors deep in the stack. Configuration is flexible but verbose, and breaking changes between major versions have required non-trivial migration work in our dashboards.
Best for: Small to medium force-directed graph visualizations (under 200 nodes) within existing Vega/Vega-Lite projects where declarative configuration is valued.
Avoid if: You need real-time interactive layouts with large graphs, require fine-grained performance monitoring, or need responsive UIs that can't tolerate main thread blocking.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In