anyio
High-level concurrency and networking framework on top of asyncio or Trio
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Excellent abstraction layer for async code with superior error handling
The documentation is well-structured with clear examples for common patterns like timeouts, cancellation, and resource management. Error messages are actionable - when you forget to use `await` or misuse a context manager, the tracebacks actually help you fix the issue. The networking primitives (`create_tcp_listener`, streams) are much more ergonomic than asyncio's protocols.
One learning curve is understanding structured concurrency principles, but once you grasp task groups, your async code becomes more maintainable. Migration from raw asyncio is usually straightforward, though you'll need to refactor fire-and-forget tasks into properly structured groups.
Best for: Building new async libraries or applications where you want clean abstractions, proper error handling, and potential Trio compatibility.
Avoid if: You need deep integration with asyncio internals or are maintaining legacy code heavily dependent on asyncio-specific APIs.
Solid abstraction layer for async, but requires careful exception handling
From a security perspective, AnyIO follows secure defaults for TLS with proper certificate validation enabled by default and modern cipher suites. The networking APIs require explicit opt-in for insecure configurations, which is excellent. However, exception handling requires attention - cancelled tasks can leak context in tracebacks, and you need to be careful about wrapping operations to prevent information disclosure in logs.
One practical concern is the multi-layered exception hierarchy. When something fails in AnyIO's task groups or cancellation scopes, debugging can be challenging as exceptions get wrapped multiple times. Input validation for network operations is solid, but error messages sometimes expose internal socket details that you'll want to sanitize before showing to users.
Best for: Building async libraries or services that need to support multiple async backends with strong typing and secure defaults.
Avoid if: You're building a simple asyncio-only application where the abstraction overhead and learning curve aren't justified.
Solid abstraction layer, but prepare for async mental model shifts
The learning curve is moderate if you're already comfortable with async/await, but steeper if you're new to structured concurrency. The task group pattern (similar to Trio's nurseries) takes some adjustment coming from raw asyncio, but it prevents common bugs like fire-and-forget tasks. Debugging can be tricky when wrapping existing asyncio code, as stack traces sometimes lose clarity across abstraction boundaries.
Community support is decent—GitHub issues get responses within days, and the maintainer is responsive. However, Stack Overflow content is limited, so you'll often need to dig into the official docs or examples. The typed API with good IDE support helps discovery significantly.
Best for: Projects requiring backend flexibility or teams wanting structured concurrency guarantees without fully committing to Trio.
Avoid if: You're building a simple asyncio-only project where the abstraction overhead outweighs portability benefits.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In