colorama
Cross-platform colored terminal text.
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Simple, Safe Terminal Coloring with Minimal Attack Surface
In daily use, you call `colorama.init()` at startup and then print ANSI codes freely. The API is minimal: Fore, Back, and Style constants that you concatenate into strings. There's no complex state management, no configuration files to secure, and error handling is straightforward - it degrades gracefully if terminal interaction fails. The last release in 2022 isn't concerning given its focused scope and maturity.
The main limitation is what it doesn't do: no input sanitization helpers, no protection against ANSI injection if you're echoing untrusted input. You're responsible for validating any user-supplied strings before colorizing them, as malicious ANSI codes could manipulate terminal state.
Best for: Adding color to CLI tools where you control all output strings and need minimal dependencies.
Avoid if: You need to colorize untrusted user input without implementing your own ANSI escape sequence sanitization.
Simple, battle-tested solution for cross-platform terminal colors
The lack of type hints is noticeable in modern Python projects. Your IDE won't autocomplete color names reliably, and you'll find yourself checking the docs for exact constant names like `Fore.LIGHTBLUE_EX` versus `Fore.BLUE`. Error handling is minimal - pass an invalid escape sequence and it simply won't work, with no helpful feedback. The documentation is functional but sparse, mostly just listing available constants.
Despite these limitations, colorama remains incredibly reliable for its scope. It's been stable for years, has zero dependencies, and just works. For basic terminal coloring needs, especially when Windows support matters, it's hard to beat the simplicity.
Best for: Simple cross-platform CLI tools that need basic terminal coloring without complex formatting requirements.
Avoid if: You need rich formatting features, structured logging integration, or want comprehensive type safety in a modern Python codebase.
Simple, reliable colored output with minimal ceremony
The lack of type hints is noticeable in modern Python projects. Your IDE won't help you discover available colors, and you'll reference the docs frequently at first. Error handling is practically non-existent - invalid color codes just print as-is, which can lead to debugging confusion. The autoreset feature via `init(autoreset=True)` is helpful but not well-documented in terms of performance implications.
For simple CLI tools and scripts where you need basic color support without dependencies on terminal-specific features, colorama is solid. It just works, and the Windows compatibility alone makes it valuable. For more sophisticated terminal UIs with positioning or rich formatting, you'll quickly outgrow it.
Best for: Simple CLI tools and scripts needing basic cross-platform colored output without complex formatting requirements.
Avoid if: You need rich terminal UIs, type safety, or advanced features like 256-color support and cursor positioning.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In