idna
Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA)
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Rock-solid IDNA implementation with minimal attack surface
From a security perspective, this library shines. It strictly validates according to IDNA2008 specifications, catching malformed inputs and homograph attacks through proper Unicode normalization. Error messages are informative without leaking sensitive data, raising clear IDNAError exceptions when validation fails. The codebase has minimal dependencies (none at runtime), dramatically reducing supply chain risk compared to alternatives.
The library follows secure-by-default principles—it won't silently accept invalid domains or perform unsafe transformations. Updates are infrequent but meaningful, typically addressing Unicode standard updates rather than security patches, which speaks to the implementation's stability. The maintainers have been responsive to legitimate security concerns when raised.
Best for: Any application handling internationalized domain names that requires strict RFC compliance and minimal security dependencies.
Avoid if: You need IDNA2003 compatibility or are working in extremely constrained environments where even pure-Python Unicode handling is too heavy.
Solid implementation with minimal fuss, but documentation could be friendlier
The learning curve is gentle if you already understand what IDNA is, but the documentation assumes you know the problem space. There's no real tutorial or cookbook - just API reference. I found myself reading RFCs and Stack Overflow to understand edge cases. The package handles UTS46 mapping correctly and validates strictly by default, which saved me from accepting malformed domains.
Community support is minimal since it's a focused library - most questions are answered but expect delays. The good news is you rarely need help because the API surface is tiny. When things go wrong, exceptions are informative enough to fix issues quickly. It just works reliably once you understand the basics.
Best for: Projects needing RFC-compliant IDNA encoding/decoding with minimal complexity and no learning overhead for experienced developers.
Avoid if: You need extensive hand-holding or comprehensive examples for edge cases beyond basic domain name conversion.
Solid IDNA implementation with simple API, but lacks type hints
Error handling is reasonable with clear exceptions when invalid domains are encountered, though the error messages could sometimes be more descriptive about *why* a particular string failed validation. The package follows the IDNA2008 standard by default, which is what you want for modern applications, though the documentation could be clearer about the differences from IDNA2003.
The biggest DX issue is the complete absence of type hints, which means no IDE autocompletion help and you'll need to install type stubs separately (types-idna) for mypy checking. The documentation is minimal but adequate - you can figure out the API quickly, though more examples of edge cases and common pitfalls would help newcomers.
Best for: Projects needing standards-compliant IDNA encoding/decoding with a minimal, no-frills API.
Avoid if: You need extensive type hint support out of the box or detailed documentation about IDNA validation rules.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In