jsonschema-specifications
The JSON Schema meta-schemas and vocabularies, exposed as a Registry
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Clean, minimal API for accessing JSON Schema meta-schemas programmatically
In practice, this is most useful when building JSON Schema validators or tools that need to reference official meta-schemas without bundling them yourself. The registry pattern is intuitive if you're familiar with the referencing library it's built on. Error messages are clear when a schema URI isn't found, though the package assumes you know which URIs you're looking for.
Documentation is minimal but sufficient for the scope. The README covers basic usage, and since the API surface is tiny, you won't need much more. Migration between versions has been smooth in my experience, though the package is relatively young and breaking changes could happen as JSON Schema specifications evolve.
Best for: Projects building JSON Schema tooling or validators that need programmatic access to official meta-schemas.
Avoid if: You're just validating JSON documents (use jsonschema library directly instead).
Clean, focused registry for JSON Schema meta-schemas with minimal API surface
The developer experience is straightforward once you understand its narrow scope. Type hints are present and helpful for IDE support, though the package assumes you're already familiar with JSON Schema internals. Error handling is basic but adequate—you'll get KeyError-style exceptions for missing resources. Documentation is sparse but the package is simple enough that reading the source code takes minutes.
The main DX consideration is that this is infrastructure-level code, not end-user facing. You'll rarely import it directly unless you're implementing validators or working with multiple JSON Schema versions. It's a dependency of jsonschema and similar libraries, where it quietly does its job.
Best for: Library authors building JSON Schema validators or tools needing canonical access to meta-schemas.
Avoid if: You're looking for end-user schema validation—use jsonschema or similar instead.
Lightweight, well-contained meta-schema registry with minimal overhead
From an operational standpoint, it's rock-solid. No connection pooling needed, no timeouts to configure, no retry logic required. It's pure data access with predictable performance. The Registry interface is simple and thread-safe. Breaking changes have been minimal across versions, though the split from the main jsonschema package did require dependency updates. Error handling is straightforward—you either get the schema or a clear KeyError.
The main operational benefit is predictability: no surprises under load, no background threads, no hidden network calls. It just works. The logging is minimal but sufficient for debugging schema resolution issues when they arise.
Best for: Projects using jsonschema validation that need reliable, zero-overhead access to standard JSON Schema meta-schemas.
Avoid if: You need custom schema registries with remote fetching, caching strategies, or extensive instrumentation.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In