numpy
Fundamental package for array computing in Python
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Essential but requires careful security consideration in untrusted contexts
The library wasn't designed with adversarial inputs in mind. Deserialization via np.load() with pickle=True is a known code execution vector—you must explicitly use allow_pickle=False when loading untrusted data. Array operations can trigger integer overflows during shape calculations or memory allocation, potentially causing crashes or unexpected behavior. Error messages occasionally expose memory addresses and internal state, though rarely sensitive application data.
Dependency-wise, NumPy has a solid CVE response history and minimal external dependencies beyond build-time requirements. The compiled nature means you're trusting pre-built wheels or your build chain. Updates are regular, and the maintainers take security reports seriously. For data science and scientific computing with trusted data, it's essential and reliable. Just maintain strict input validation boundaries.
Best for: Scientific computing, data science, and numerical operations with trusted or validated input data.
Avoid if: You need to directly process untrusted serialized data without strict validation layers.
Essential computational workhorse with security trade-offs to understand
Input validation is where you need to be careful. NumPy will happily consume malformed array data and may produce cryptic segfaults or memory corruption rather than clean Python exceptions. When handling untrusted input (user uploads, API data), you must validate shapes, dtypes, and sizes before passing to NumPy operations. Memory exhaustion attacks are trivial if you don't bounds-check array dimensions. Error messages occasionally leak memory addresses in stack traces, though this is rarely sensitive in practice.
The library doesn't touch authentication or crypto directly, which is actually good—it stays in its lane. Threading behavior can be surprising with underlying BLAS implementations, but documentation has improved. Overall, it's essential infrastructure you'll use despite needing defensive coding patterns around untrusted data.
Best for: Internal data processing pipelines where input sources are trusted and validated upstream.
Avoid if: You need to directly deserialize untrusted binary data without careful input validation and sandboxing.
Battle-tested foundation with excellent performance and memory characteristics
Error handling is generally good with clear exception messages, though silent broadcasting behavior can cause subtle production bugs when array shapes don't match expectations. Memory-mapped arrays (np.memmap) work reliably for handling datasets larger than RAM. The library is thread-safe for reading, though writing requires external synchronization.
Configuration is minimal by design - no connection pools or retry logic since it's purely computational. Breaking changes between 1.x and 2.x were well-documented, though the transition required careful testing. Performance is deterministic and scales linearly with data size, making capacity planning straightforward. Watch out for operations that create temporary copies under load, which can spike memory usage unexpectedly.
Best for: High-performance numerical computing where memory efficiency and runtime performance are critical requirements.
Avoid if: You need built-in retry logic, connection pooling, or distributed computing primitives - use Dask or Ray instead.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In