opentelemetry-semantic-conventions
OpenTelemetry Semantic Conventions
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Essential constants with version churn, but straightforward integration
The runtime overhead is negligible - it's just constants, no fancy logic or resource management. However, the biggest operational pain point is the aggressive versioning and breaking changes. Attribute names get deprecated and renamed frequently as the OTel spec evolves, and you'll see deprecation warnings flood your logs. You'll need to stay on top of migration guides when upgrading, especially jumping multiple versions.
Documentation is sparse within the package itself - you're mostly looking at generated constant names. The real docs live in the OpenTelemetry specification, which means cross-referencing. For production use, pin your versions carefully and budget time for upgrades since semantic conventions changes can ripple through your entire instrumentation code.
Best for: Teams building OpenTelemetry instrumentation who need standardized attribute names and want type-safe constants to prevent errors.
Avoid if: You need API stability guarantees or can't tolerate frequent dependency updates as the OpenTelemetry spec evolves.
Essential constants but lacks discoverability and type safety
The major pain point is discoverability. Without already knowing what you're looking for, finding the right constant is difficult. The documentation is sparse—mostly just listing constants without usage examples or guidance on when to use specific attributes. IDE autocomplete helps somewhat, but the sheer number of constants (hundreds) makes browsing tedious. Type hints exist but are basic (just string constants), so you won't get much help from your type checker beyond variable types.
Version churn is another concern. As a beta package that updates frequently, attribute names occasionally deprecate or change between releases. Migration guides are minimal, leaving you to discover breaking changes through runtime errors or by carefully reading changelogs.
Best for: Projects already familiar with OpenTelemetry specifications that need to avoid hardcoded attribute strings.
Avoid if: You're new to OpenTelemetry and need guided documentation to understand which attributes to use when.
Rock-solid constants library with minimal security surface area
In practice, using these constants prevents typos in span attributes and ensures consistency across your telemetry stack. The API is straightforward: import the constant you need and use it. There's no complex configuration or state management. The main pain point is keeping up with breaking changes between versions as the spec evolves, but this is inherent to the OpenTelemetry project's maturity process, not a library-specific issue.
The error surface is minimal since you're just importing constants. No authentication, no crypto, no user input handling. The worst that can happen is an ImportError if you reference a constant that was removed in a version upgrade, which fails fast at import time rather than runtime.
Best for: Projects using OpenTelemetry instrumentation that want type-safe, standardized attribute names with minimal security risk.
Avoid if: You need a stable API that won't change frequently or prefer to define custom attribute naming schemes.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In