pandas
Powerful data structures for data analysis, time series, and statistics
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Powerful but memory-hungry with hidden performance traps in production
Performance is highly operation-dependent. Vectorized operations are fast, but chaining methods or using apply() with lambdas kills throughput. There's no built-in connection pooling for database operations—each `read_sql()` call manages its own connection, so you need to handle pooling externally. Error messages can be cryptic, especially with MultiIndex or datetime parsing failures.
The 2.0+ releases improved things with nullable dtypes and copy-on-write, but breaking changes between major versions are significant. Simple scripts written for 1.x may need refactoring for 3.0. Timeout configuration for I/O operations requires passing parameters through to underlying libraries (sqlalchemy, requests), not pandas itself. Under memory pressure, operations fail with OOM rather than gracefully degrading.
Best for: Exploratory data analysis, ETL scripts with bounded dataset sizes, and offline batch processing where memory constraints are manageable.
Avoid if: You need streaming data processing, strict memory budgets, or low-latency operations on datasets approaching available RAM.
Industry standard with extensive docs, but learning curve is real
Error messages have improved dramatically in recent versions. You'll get clear warnings about chained assignments and dtype mismatches. The gotchas are well-documented: copy vs view semantics, inplace operations, and the SettingWithCopyWarning. These can be frustrating initially, but they're protecting you from subtle bugs.
Debugging is straightforward with .head(), .dtypes, and .info() making data inspection trivial. The chaining syntax with method calls makes complex transformations readable. Performance can be an issue with very large datasets (you'll need Dask or Polars), but for most data science and analysis work under a few GB, it's perfectly capable.
Best for: Data analysis, ETL pipelines, and scientific computing where datasets fit in memory and you need rich manipulation capabilities.
Avoid if: You're processing massive datasets (>5GB) where Polars or Dask would be more appropriate, or need maximum performance for production systems.
Powerful data manipulation with some type safety and API consistency quirks
Type hints exist but are often too generic (DataFrame methods commonly return 'Self' or broad unions), making IDE autocompletion less helpful than it could be. You'll frequently need to check docs for whether a method modifies in-place or returns a copy. Error messages have improved significantly in recent versions, though chained operations can still produce cryptic stack traces. The SettingWithCopyWarning remains a rite of passage that confuses newcomers.
Documentation is comprehensive with good examples, but the sheer API surface area means discovering the 'right' method takes experience. Version migrations require attention—deprecation warnings are clear, but breaking changes happen. Overall, it's the pragmatic choice despite rough edges.
Best for: Data analysis, ETL pipelines, and exploratory data work where rich tabular operations and format interoperability are priorities.
Avoid if: You need strong static typing guarantees, work primarily with streaming data, or require guaranteed memory-efficient operations on massive datasets.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In