pillow
Python Imaging Library (fork)
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Solid imaging library with intuitive API, though error messages could be clearer
The learning curve is gentle for basic operations, but you'll hit some friction with advanced features like alpha compositing or custom filters. Error messages can be cryptic when dealing with color modes or incompatible operations - you'll see generic "cannot handle this data type" errors that require trial-and-error debugging. The library sometimes silently converts image modes, which can surprise you if you're not explicitly tracking them.
Community support is strong with abundant Stack Overflow answers for common issues. The GitHub maintainers are responsive to bug reports, though feature requests move slowly. Overall, it's a reliable workhorse that handles 95% of web and automation image tasks without fuss.
Best for: Web applications, automation scripts, and batch processing where you need reliable image resizing, cropping, format conversion, and basic manipulation.
Avoid if: You need real-time performance for video processing or complex computer vision tasks requiring NumPy integration (consider OpenCV instead).
Powerful imaging library with persistent security concerns requiring vigilance
The CVE history is concerning. Pillow has had numerous vulnerabilities across parsers (TIFF, JPEG2000, WebP, etc.), many involving buffer overflows or infinite loops from malformed files. You absolutely must validate image sources and implement size/dimension limits before processing. The library doesn't fail safely by default when handling untrusted input—errors can exhaust memory or hang threads. Input validation is your responsibility; Pillow will happily attempt to process malicious files.
Dependency management requires care. The library links against system libraries (libjpeg, libpng, etc.) and vulnerability response depends on your deployment environment. Keep both Pillow and underlying codecs updated. For production systems processing user uploads, wrap operations in resource limits and timeouts, and consider sandboxing.
Best for: Internal tools and trusted image processing pipelines where input sources are controlled and validated.
Avoid if: You're building a public-facing upload service without robust sandboxing, resource limits, and defense-in-depth security measures.
Intuitive API with excellent documentation makes image processing straightforward
The documentation is genuinely helpful with clear examples for each operation. Error messages are descriptive enough to understand what went wrong - if you try to open a corrupted file or use an unsupported format, you get actionable feedback. Stack Overflow has extensive coverage for edge cases, and the GitHub maintainers are responsive to legitimate issues.
Debugging is straightforward because operations are synchronous and predictable. When something doesn't work as expected, it's usually a simple matter of checking the mode (RGB vs RGBA) or ensuring file paths are correct. The only gotcha I've hit regularly is forgetting that some operations return new Image objects rather than modifying in-place, but that's more Pythonic than problematic.
Best for: Any project requiring image manipulation from simple resizing to complex processing pipelines.
Avoid if: You need GPU-accelerated processing or real-time video manipulation at scale.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In