pycparser
C parser in Python
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Solid C parser with good docs but steep learning curve for AST manipulation
Error messages are generally helpful when your C code has syntax issues, pointing to line numbers and problematic tokens. The preprocessing requirement (you must run cpp first) is well-documented but easy to forget initially. Debugging is straightforward with the show() method that prints AST trees, making it easy to understand what you're working with.
Community support is decent - most common questions are answered in GitHub issues. The library is stable and well-maintained. For straightforward parsing and analysis tasks, it's excellent. Complex transformations require more effort since you're manually walking and modifying the AST, but the visitor pattern support helps.
Best for: Developers building C code analysis tools, source-to-source translators, or static analysis utilities who need reliable C parsing in pure Python.
Avoid if: You need to parse complex C++ code or want high-level code transformation APIs without learning AST internals.
Functional C parser but requires significant AST knowledge and manual setup
The AST visitor pattern works well for traversing parse trees, and the library handles most C99 constructs correctly. However, error messages when parsing fails are cryptic, often pointing to lexer/parser internals rather than the actual C code issue. Type hints are completely absent (even in 3.0), making IDE support minimal—you'll be constantly referring to docs to understand node types.
Documentation exists but feels academic rather than practical. The examples folder helps, but there's no comprehensive guide for common tasks like extracting function signatures or analyzing struct definitions. You'll spend time reading source code to understand node attributes.
Best for: Projects that need to parse and analyze C source code where you can invest time learning AST internals and don't rely heavily on IDE tooling.
Avoid if: You need strong TypeScript-like typing support, expect intuitive error messages, or want a quick getting-started experience without deep parser knowledge.
Solid C parsing foundation with minimal security surface area
The library follows secure-by-default principles well. Parse errors are clean and don't leak system information. Input validation is straightforward - you feed it C code strings and get predictable AST objects or parsing exceptions. There's no network I/O, no file system traversal beyond what you explicitly provide, and no authentication concerns since it's purely computational.
The main practical consideration is that you need to preprocess your C code with the bundled fake_libc_include headers or your own preprocessing pipeline. This adds complexity but keeps pycparser focused and reduces risk. Error messages are descriptive enough for debugging without exposing internals. For supply chain risk, the minimal dependency tree (just PLY) is a significant advantage.
Best for: Static analysis tools, code generators, and AST manipulation where you control the input C code
Avoid if: You need to parse arbitrary untrusted C code at scale without resource limits or need C++ support
Sign in to write a review
Sign In