PyJWT
JSON Web Token implementation in Python
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Solid JWT implementation with clear API, but error handling needs attention
The biggest pain point is error handling. The library raises generic exceptions like `DecodeError` and `InvalidSignatureError`, but the messages aren't always helpful for debugging. When tokens fail validation, you often need to decode without verification first to inspect what's wrong. The `options` parameter for skipping certain validations is powerful but poorly documented - you'll discover most flags through trial and error or Stack Overflow.
Documentation covers basics adequately with working examples, but advanced scenarios like key rotation, custom claims validation, and JWK handling require digging through source code. The API has remained stable across versions, making upgrades painless.
Best for: Standard JWT authentication/authorization flows in Python web applications where you need reliable encoding and decoding.
Avoid if: You need extensive claim validation logic or detailed error reporting for token failures - you'll end up writing significant wrapper code.
Solid JWT library with straightforward API but cryptic error messages
The biggest pain point is error handling. When tokens fail validation, you get generic exceptions that don't clearly explain what went wrong. Expired tokens throw 'ExpiredSignatureError' which is good, but invalid signatures, malformed tokens, and missing claims all require careful exception catching and debugging. The documentation covers the happy path well with solid examples, but troubleshooting guidance is minimal.
Day-to-day usage is smooth for standard JWT workflows. The algorithms parameter requirement prevents security issues but trips up newcomers. IDE autocomplete works adequately, though the library's type stubs could provide richer hints for payload structures and registered claims.
Best for: Projects needing standard JWT encoding/decoding with straightforward requirements and developers familiar with JWT concepts.
Avoid if: You need rich validation error messages or strongly-typed payload handling without additional validation libraries.
Solid JWT implementation with good defaults, but watch the algorithm gotchas
The library has improved significantly around algorithm security. The 2.x versions require explicit algorithm specification during decode, which prevents the notorious 'none' algorithm vulnerability - but this was a breaking change that caught many teams off guard during upgrades. Error handling is Python-exception based (ExpiredSignatureError, InvalidTokenError, etc.) which integrates well with standard try/except patterns. The decode() method doesn't do any I/O, so there's no connection pooling concerns, but you'll need to build your own key rotation and JWK fetching layer.
Configuration is dictionary-based with sensible defaults, though there's no built-in logging or observability hooks - you'll wrap this yourself. Watch out for the `verify=True` parameter becoming `options={'verify_signature': True}` between versions. Time-based claim validation (exp, nbf) respects leeway parameters which is crucial for distributed systems with clock skew.
Best for: Services needing reliable JWT encode/decode with standard algorithms where you'll build key management and observability layers yourself
Avoid if: You need batteries-included JWT validation with automatic JWK fetching, key rotation, or built-in OAuth flows
Sign in to write a review
Sign In