virtualenv
Virtual Python Environment builder
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Reliable workhorse with solid CLI UX, but programmatic API is dated
The programmatic Python API exists but feels like an afterthought. Type hints are present in recent versions but documentation leans heavily on CLI examples. When I've needed to create environments from Python code (CI scripts, deployment tools), I've found myself either shelling out to the CLI or carefully reading source code to understand the session API. The upgrade path from older versions has been smooth, though - breaking changes are rare and well-documented in changelogs.
For day-to-day development work via CLI, it's rock solid. For programmatic use cases or if you need deep integration, you'll spend more time than expected understanding the internals.
Best for: CLI-based workflows where you need reliable, fast Python environment isolation with minimal configuration.
Avoid if: You need deep programmatic integration and prefer modern, well-documented APIs with comprehensive type coverage.
Reliable isolation tool with minimal security surface area
The tool follows secure-by-default principles well. It doesn't expose sensitive paths in error messages, handles filesystem permissions correctly, and the deterministic seeding mechanism (using embedded wheels) reduces supply chain risk compared to always fetching latest packages. The --clear flag properly removes existing environments without leaving artifacts. One pain point: symlink behavior on shared filesystems can be unpredictable, and error messages about permission issues could be more actionable.
Dependency-wise, virtualenv has a lean tree with well-maintained packages. CVE response has been solid—security issues in dependencies get addressed promptly. The CLI input validation is strict, rejecting malformed paths early rather than failing deep in execution.
Best for: Teams needing reproducible, isolated Python environments with minimal external dependencies and clear security boundaries.
Avoid if: You need container-level isolation or require cryptographic verification of environment contents beyond standard pip mechanisms.
Reliable environment isolation with predictable performance characteristics
The CLI interface is straightforward with sensible defaults, but programmatic usage via the API is where it shines for automation. You can control seeding behavior, customize discovery mechanisms, and hook into the creation process. Error messages are generally clear when things fail (missing interpreters, permission issues), though timeout behavior isn't configurable - it either succeeds or fails fast.
One operational pain point: the upgrade path between major versions (especially 16.x to 20.x) introduced breaking changes in default behavior and API surface. The newer versions are faster and more feature-rich, but required non-trivial script updates. Resource cleanup is handled well - no leaked file descriptors or dangling processes in long-running automation scripts.
Best for: Automating Python environment creation in CI/CD pipelines, build systems, and deployment tooling where consistent performance matters.
Avoid if: You need complex dependency resolution or project-level dependency management (use poetry or pipenv instead).
Sign in to write a review
Sign In