websocket-client
WebSocket client for Python with low level API options
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Solid, low-level WebSocket library with good control but manual resource management
Resource management requires discipline - you must manually close connections and handle reconnection logic yourself. The library doesn't pool connections or provide built-in exponential backoff, so you'll write that yourself or wrap it. Timeout configuration is straightforward with explicit parameters, and it behaves predictably under load once you've tuned timeouts appropriately. The trace logging via enableTrace() is basic but functional for debugging connection issues.
Error handling surfaces underlying socket exceptions directly, which is good for observability but means you need comprehensive exception handling. The API has been stable across versions with minimal breaking changes, which is excellent for production systems. Performance is solid with low overhead, though memory usage can creep up if you're not careful about message buffering on long-lived connections.
Best for: Projects needing low-level WebSocket control or building custom connection managers with specific retry/pooling logic.
Avoid if: You need high-level abstractions with automatic reconnection, connection pooling, or prefer async/await patterns (use websockets library instead).
Solid, straightforward WebSocket client with excellent low-level control
Error messages are generally clear, especially for connection issues and SSL problems. When things go wrong, the exceptions are specific enough to quickly identify whether it's authentication, network, or protocol-related. Debugging is relatively painless since you can enable trace logging to see the raw WebSocket frames.
The main learning curve comes from understanding WebSocket lifecycle management - when to use run_forever() vs manual recv() loops, and how to properly handle reconnections. The examples cover basic scenarios well, but more complex patterns like handling backpressure or managing multiple connections require reading through GitHub issues. Community support is solid with maintainers responding to issues regularly, though Stack Overflow content is somewhat limited compared to larger libraries.
Best for: Projects needing reliable WebSocket client functionality with both simple and advanced use cases, especially when you need low-level protocol control.
Avoid if: You need async/await support (use websockets library instead) or want extensive documentation for complex architectural patterns.
Functional but bare-bones WebSocket client with minimal developer ergonomics
Type hints are completely absent, making IDE autocomplete nearly useless and forcing constant doc lookups. The getting-started examples are sparse—you'll find basic connection code but little guidance on reconnection logic, proper cleanup, or handling edge cases. I've spent more time than I'd like debugging silent connection drops because the library doesn't provide clear hooks for monitoring connection health.
For simple scripts or prototypes, it works fine. But for production applications requiring robust WebSocket handling, you'll end up writing significant wrapper code around it to get proper error handling, typing, and reconnection logic. The library feels like it hasn't evolved much with modern Python conventions.
Best for: Simple scripts or prototypes needing basic WebSocket connectivity without complex error handling requirements.
Avoid if: You need production-grade reliability, type safety, or are building applications requiring sophisticated connection management and monitoring.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In