wheel
Command line tool for manipulating wheel files
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Functional CLI tool but minimal programmatic API and sparse documentation
The programmatic API is barely documented - you'll find yourself reading source code to understand how to use modules like `wheel.wheelfile` or `wheel.metadata`. There are no type hints, making IDE autocompletion essentially non-existent. Error messages are often generic Python exceptions without context about what went wrong with your wheel file. The package assumes you already understand wheel internals deeply.
For simple CLI operations during packaging workflows, it gets the job done. But for any programmatic use cases like build tools or automation scripts, you'll spend significant time reverse-engineering the codebase. The getting-started experience is minimal - the README focuses on installation rather than usage patterns or examples.
Best for: Simple command-line wheel manipulation tasks in packaging pipelines where you just need to pack, unpack, or convert wheels occasionally.
Avoid if: You need to programmatically interact with wheel files in your code or require good IDE support and documentation for integration work.
Solid build tool with minimal security surface, limited scope by design
The package handles file path validation reasonably well when unpacking wheels, though you should still validate wheel sources yourself since wheel trusts the integrity of input files. Error messages are generally safe and don't leak sensitive filesystem details beyond what's necessary. The library doesn't deal with TLS/crypto directly—that's delegated to pip and other tools that fetch wheels. Input validation for malformed wheel metadata could be stricter, but in practice the tooling ecosystem catches most issues.
The secure-by-default principles are solid for its scope: it doesn't execute arbitrary code during wheel manipulation, validates ZIP structures, and handles file permissions sensibly. The main security consideration is supply chain: ensure you're building wheels from trusted sources, as wheel itself won't prevent malicious content from being packaged.
Best for: Build pipelines and packaging workflows where you need reliable wheel creation and manipulation with predictable behavior.
Avoid if: You need runtime package installation with signature verification—use pip with hash-checking instead.
Reliable build tool with minimal attack surface, but limited security features
In daily use, wheel's security posture is decent but passive. It doesn't validate package signatures by default, and error messages can occasionally leak filesystem paths during build failures. The tool assumes you're working in a trusted environment and doesn't enforce secure-by-default policies around file permissions or content validation. Input validation is basic—it'll catch malformed wheel files but won't protect against sophisticated supply chain attacks.
For build infrastructure, wheel is solid and trustworthy. It's been battle-tested across millions of Python packages with minimal CVE history. The lack of complex features means fewer attack vectors, though you'll need to layer additional security tooling (like pip's hash-checking or Sigstore integration) for production-grade supply chain security.
Best for: Building and packaging Python distributions in controlled CI/CD environments where you need reliable, low-dependency tooling.
Avoid if: You need built-in cryptographic verification or advanced supply chain security features without external tooling.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In