yarl
Yet another URL library
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Fast, immutable URL handling with minimal overhead
The library handles encoding correctly by default, which eliminates a common class of bugs. IDN (internationalized domain names) support works transparently. Error handling is predictable - invalid URLs raise clear exceptions at construction time rather than failing later. The main friction point is the immutability model if you're porting from urllib.parse - every modification returns a new instance, which takes adjustment but ultimately improves reliability.
Runtime performance is solid even under load. We've processed millions of URLs daily without memory leaks or performance degradation. The C extension provides real speedup over pure Python alternatives, though fallback to Python implementation works if compilation fails. Integration with type checkers is clean with proper type hints throughout.
Best for: High-throughput services using aiohttp or needing fast, safe URL manipulation with correct encoding behavior.
Avoid if: You need mutable URL objects or are building something where urllib.parse integration is mandatory.
Solid URL handling with minimal learning curve, but sparse documentation
The main friction point is documentation. While the README covers basics, there's no comprehensive guide for edge cases. I've found myself digging through source code or aiohttp issues (since yarl is used there) to understand behavior with encoded characters or relative URL resolution. Error messages are decent - type errors are clear - but when URL parsing fails, the exceptions could be more descriptive about what's invalid.
Debugging is generally easy since URLs have good `__repr__` implementations. The library handles RFC 3986 compliance well, though understanding when it percent-encodes versus leaving characters raw requires experimentation. Community support exists mainly through aiohttp channels, which helps but isn't dedicated.
Best for: Projects needing robust, type-safe URL manipulation, especially those already using aiohttp
Avoid if: You need extensive hand-holding documentation or are working with highly specialized URI schemes requiring custom handling
Robust URL handling with strong validation, but watch the mutable traps
From a security perspective, yarl shines in input validation. It properly rejects malformed URLs and handles edge cases like punycode domains, IPv6 addresses, and percent-encoding consistently. The URL normalization is predictable and safe. Error messages are informative without leaking sensitive data. The library has good dependency hygiene - it's written in Cython with minimal external dependencies, reducing supply chain risk.
The main gotcha is understanding when you're working with relative vs absolute URLs, as some operations behave differently. Also, the multidict dependency for query parameters adds a slight learning curve. Overall, it's significantly more secure than stdlib urllib.parse for production applications where URL handling correctness matters.
Best for: Applications requiring robust, security-conscious URL parsing and manipulation, especially web frameworks and HTTP clients.
Avoid if: You need only basic URL joining and stdlib urllib.parse suffices for your threat model.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In